Hľadaj
Zobraz:
Univerzity
Kategórie
Rozšírené vyhľadávanie
45 077 projektov
0 nových
Home » Esej » Commentary on Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010 of the International Court of Justice on the question: “Is the unilateral declaration of independence by the Provisional Institutio
Commentary on Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010 of the International Court of Justice on the question: “Is the unilateral declaration of independence by the Provisional Institutio
«»
| Prípona |
Typ esej |
Stiahnuté 2 x |
| Veľkosť 0,1 MB |
Jazyk anglický |
ID projektu 39015 |
| Posledná úprava 10.12.2011 |
Zobrazené 2 916 x |
Autor: milansuchy1 |
Zdieľaj na Facebooku |
||
| Detaily projektu | ||
- cena:
10 Kreditov - kvalita:
96,9% -
Stiahni
- Pridaj na porovnanie
- Univerzita:Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika v Košiciach
- Fakulta:Právnická fakulta
- Kategória:Humanitné vedy » Právo
- Predmet:Public International Law
- Študijný program:Právo všeobecné
- Ročník:3. ročník
- Formát:PDF dokument (.pdf)
- Rozsah A4:9 strán
Komentár na stanovisko Medzinárodného súdneho dvora vo veci vyhlásenia nezávislosti Kosova.
1. Introduction
I would like to start my commentary with the citation of Björn Arp who said that this „advisory opinion might not enter into the judicial history of the court for its answer to this qestion, but rather for what it did not say“.
Before International Court of Justice (thereinafter ICJ) issued its controversial advisory opinion, the Office of the Legal Adviser representing the United States in oral arguments before the ICJ had published very clear statement which presented how should ICJ solve this issue: „The Court may answer the question posed to it and opine that international law did not prohibit Kosovo's Declaration of Independence, without addressing other political situations or complex issues of self-determination raised by a number of States in these proceedings“
1. Introduction
I would like to start my commentary with the citation of Björn Arp who said that this „advisory opinion might not enter into the judicial history of the court for its answer to this qestion, but rather for what it did not say“.
Before International Court of Justice (thereinafter ICJ) issued its controversial advisory opinion, the Office of the Legal Adviser representing the United States in oral arguments before the ICJ had published very clear statement which presented how should ICJ solve this issue: „The Court may answer the question posed to it and opine that international law did not prohibit Kosovo's Declaration of Independence, without addressing other political situations or complex issues of self-determination raised by a number of States in these proceedings“
Kľúčové slová:
Kosovo
vyhlásenie nezávislosti
advisory opinion
medzinárodný súdny dvor
Obsah:
- 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................3
2. The Case .................................................................................................................................3
2.1 Historical and factual background of the case..............................................................3
2.2 The structure of the Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010..............................................4
2.3 The legal framework applicable on Kosovo at the moment of adoption the
declaration ..........................................................................................................................4
3. Legal arguments .....................................................................................................................4
3.1 Principle of territorial integrity.....................................................................................4
3.2 Question of legal capacity of the authors of Declaration .............................................6
3.3 Potential international criminal liablility of the authors of Declaration.......................6
3.4 Democratic principle of minority consultation.............................................................6
4. General Conclusion ................................................................................................................7
5. Sources....................................................................................................................................9
Zdroje:
- JOURNALS AND PERIODICALS
- German Law Journal 1 July/1 August, 2010
- American Journal of International Law, January, 2010
- Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010 of the International Court of Justice
- Summary of the Advisory Opinion, Summary 2010/2, 22 July 2010
- Dissenting opinion of Judge Koroma in Kosovo case
- Declaration of judge Simma in Kosovo case
- Declaration of vice-president Tomka in Kosovo case
- Written Statement of Slovakia, The Hague, 16 April 2009, No.:2225/2009-NLVV
- North Sea Continental Shelf case
- Security Council resolution 1244
- Constitutional Framework for Kosovo
- BASIC DOCUMENTS
- Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online
- Akehurst´s modern introduction to international law, seventh revised edition, Peter Malanczuk (concerning Diplomatic methods of dispute settlement)
- www.euroiuris.sk (concerning teleological interpretation of law used by the European Court of Justice)
Pridaj projekt
Pridaj projekt a získaj kredity za stiahnutie. S kreditmi možeš sťahovať iné projekty. Je to jednoduché :)
Najčastejšie
Zobraz
Odporúčame
Zadania-seminarky.sk
2006 - 2024 © všetky práva vyhradené